Artificial intelligence is transforming economies, public administration and legal systems around the world at an unprecedented pace. Today, lawmakers face the challenge of fostering innovation while protecting fundamental rights, ensuring transparency and maintaining accountability.
The United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, the European Union and Ukraine are each developing their own approaches to AI regulation. Although their legal frameworks differ, they share a common objective: ensuring the safe and responsible development of artificial intelligence while upholding the rule of law, international cooperation and public trust.
Recognising the growing importance of international AI governance, the editorial team of Congress.net invited Nataliia Fursenko, PhD in Law, to participate in an exclusive interview as an expert in international and migration law, comparative legal studies and the legal regulation of artificial intelligence.
During the interview, Nataliia Fursenko shared her views on the future of AI governance, the evolving role of legal professionals, comparative approaches adopted by the United States, Spain, the European Union and Ukraine, and the importance of LegalTech innovation in strengthening access to justice and international legal cooperation.
Congress.net:
Governments around the world are introducing AI legislation at an unprecedented pace. Why has AI regulation become such an urgent priority?
Nataliia Fursenko
Artificial intelligence is evolving much faster than traditional legal systems can adapt. Governments must create legal frameworks that encourage innovation while protecting fundamental rights and maintaining public confidence. Lawyers are becoming architects of the legal framework for the digital era.
Congress.net:
Many experts describe AI as a geopolitical issue rather than merely a technological one. Do you agree?
Nataliia Fursenko
Absolutely. The United States focuses on innovation, while the European Union, including Spain, emphasizes transparency and fundamental rights. Ukraine continues aligning its legal framework with European standards. International cooperation is essential because AI does not recognize national borders.
Congress.net:
How will the role of international lawyers evolve?
Nataliia Fursenko
Future lawyers must combine legal expertise with knowledge of AI, cybersecurity, data governance, digital evidence, international compliance and comparative law.
Congress.net:
What inspired your LegalTech initiatives?
Nataliia Fursenko
My research led to the development of the Legal Bridge Method, LegalPilot, the AI Legal Relocation Assistant and the Legal Relocation Academy to simplify cross-border legal navigation while preserving professional legal responsibility.
Congress.net:
What principles should guide AI regulation?
Nataliia Fursenko
Transparency, accountability and international interoperability should form the foundation of effective AI governance.
Congress.net:
Can AI replace lawyers?
Nataliia Fursenko
No. AI enhances legal practice but cannot replace professional judgment, ethics and human responsibility.
Congress.net:
How do you envision the legal system of the future?
Nataliia Fursenko
The future belongs to intelligent legal ecosystems where AI supports legal professionals. Innovation creates opportunity, but trust creates legitimacy.
