Departing Rep. Chip Roy Warns Congress That “But China” Is Not An AI Policy

As Rep. Chip Roy prepares to leave Congress, the Texas Republican is spending his final stretch in office issuing stark warnings about artificial intelligence governance.

Roy has represented Texas’ 21st District since 2019 and is now using his exit to deliver a blunt message to both Big Tech and his fellow lawmakers.

In a candid exit interview with Politico, Roy said he is genuinely wrestling with what government’s role should be as AI reshapes American life.

He directed particular criticism at the tech industry’s habit of invoking China as a reason to avoid any regulatory conversation whatsoever.

“So far the Big Tech bros’ answer has been: ‘but China,'” Roy said. “‘But China’ is not a policy prescription. It’s a fear mechanism.”

The White House’s position has largely centered on the need for the United States to beat China in the AI race, and Roy’s critique cuts directly against that framing.

In Roy’s view, pointing to China as a reason to resist any rules is a scare tactic rather than a serious answer, and he said industry leaders “need better answers” if they expect lawmakers to simply let the market sort it out.

“You cannot just put your head in the sand on AI and say, ‘I hope it works out,'” Roy told Politico, adding that dismissing government’s role entirely was equally unworkable.

“We’re going to have to be thoughtful as leaders and actually have some friggin’ leadership,” he said, drawing a sharp line between genuine policy engagement and political deflection.

On the Senate side, Commerce Chair Ted Cruz endorsed legislation to prevent “catastrophic risk” following warnings from an Anthropic researcher, signaling some Republican openness to guardrails.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Amy Klobuchar have been touted as backers of a bipartisan AI bill intended to lay out more concrete federal regulations for the industry.

However, neither senator has specified when they plan to actually introduce the bill, and requests for comment reportedly went unanswered or produced only vague statements.

One measure that has moved in the current session is the AWARE Act, introduced in the House in September 2025, directing the Federal Trade Commission to create AI safety educational resources for parents, educators, and minors.

Critics note the AWARE Act is an education-focused measure rather than a substantive regulatory framework, reflecting just how divided Congress remains on the broader question of AI oversight.

Roy’s departure leaves a notable voice absent from these debates at a moment when the country is navigating some of the most consequential technological shifts in its modern history.